Inconsistencies in the way all levels of government plan and zone land use then assess development proposals, has been identified in a draft report released this week by the Productivity Commission.
In Performance Benchmarking of Australian Business Regulation: Planning, Zoning and Development Assessments -- a report commissioned by COAG (Council of Australian Governments)-- the Commission examines the regulatory frameworks of each jurisdiction, the processes for supply of land, the bases for assessing developer contributions, compliance costs for business and competition issues arising from planning decision-making. Governance of the various planning systems and matters of transparency and accountability are also explored.
Commissioner Louise Sylvan remarked that by its very nature, the task of planning and zoning land to enable those uses that will optimise the welfare of communities and the nation is complicated.
"However, this complexity can be managed better and deliver better outcomes", she said.
The report identifies numerous leading practices that can contribute to smoother processes and improved outcomes, such as:
- putting the focus of effort into the strategic planning level, including a strong engagement of the community and resolving conflicting objectives at this level of city planning
- ensuring that local plans are more quickly brought up to date with the strategic city plans
- applying consistent and efficient criteria to determine the level of contributions of developers to infrastructure costs
- ensuring that certain practices, such as considering a new entrant's effects on existing businesses, are being eliminated as an appropriate planning consideration
- creating disincentives for appealing against developments by those seeking to delay or prevent potential competitors entering
- completing structure planning of rezoned greenfield/brownfield areas before development commences
- implementing electronic development assessments and impact-based assessment tracks.
Although each jurisdiction is home to at least one leading practice, the report concludes there are opportunities for all jurisdictions to improve the way they conduct planning, zoning and development assessment in order to reduce burdens on business, costs to the community, increase competition and improve the liveability of cities.
The Property Council of Australia and the Residential Development Council welcomed the report, saying it shines the light on much-needed reform.
Peter Verwer, Chief Executive of the Property Council of Australia commented that it provides `incontrovertible proof that Australia's current planning systems are muddled, complex and inefficient'.
"Modernising these systems will lift economic growth and improve people's lives", Mr Verwer said.
"The report also highlights the breakdown in governance that results from overlapping planning fiefdoms and guilds", he noted.
The Commission seeks comment on the draft report before finalising its report at the end of April.
No comments:
Post a Comment